An organization has a directive to adopt a Zero Trust framework focused on using identity and role-based access groups, device security and content inspection across all Security policies. To achieve this goal, an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) was purchased, including Advanced Threat Prevention, IoT Security, and GlobalProtect.
The current security architecture uses Panorama to manage 60 NGFWs - a mix of PA-3240, PA-1410, and PA-440. Sites with PA-3240s host private application resources in the trust data center zone All sites have an untrust zone for internet access and a users zone for managed and unmanaged endpoint devices. A transit mesh zone exists to establish site-to-site connectivity through PAN-OS SD-WAN.
Privately hosted applications include web servers, SMB and NFS file servers and hosted Active Directory. The organization is in the process of adopting group mapping restrictions to these private applications, with daily additions of groups. It is also planning to build AI applications to assist the data teams with complex queries that will be hosted in the large offices containing data centers and is exploring hosting in the public cloud.
The organization uses on-premises Exchange, Dropbox, Zoom, and ChatGPT. There are a number of shadow SaaS applications that require further investigation. Users have been using Google Drive to upload confidential files within the organization by using their personal logins.
IoT devices on the network are associated on their own VLAN on the users zone. Using Device Security, all IoT devices have been categorized by asset profiles with medium or high confidence, policy sets imported into Panorama, and a default deny applied to the IoT networks.
The organization has rolled out SSL decryption and is using URL categorization for the majority of content filtering. Malicious categories, unknown and high-risk websites are blocked, with the remainder of sites set to alert.
Which deployment method should the architect suggest for enabling User-ID based rules, restricting or allowing access as close to the source as possible, while minimizing operational overhead?

• A. Panorama device template for data redistribution, referencing primary and secondary Panoramas as the User-ID agent
• B. Cloud Identity agent to sync user groups to the Cloud Identity Engine and the firewalls
• C. Cloud Directory via SCIM to sync user groups to the Cloud Identity Engine and the firewalls
• D. Panorama device template with a group mapping profile with group allow list to reduce group update time on the firewalls

An architect is designing a security solution for a large AWS environment with numerous application virtual private clouds (VPCs). These applications have diverse and sometimes conflicting inbound security requirements, making a single, unified ruleset challenging to create and maintain. The solution must secure inbound traffic for different application groups while also centrally securing all outbound and east-west traffic via an AWS Transit Gateway. Which design model recommendation will simplify rule complexity for inbound traffic while meeting all security requirements?

• A. Centralized model to consolidating all security functions by directing all inbound, outbound, and east-west traffic through a single, shared security VPC
• B. Isolated model deploying a separate non-connected security VPC for each application VPC
• C. Combined model using dedicated inbound NGFWs for logical application groups and a central NGFW for east-west and outbound traffic
• D. Transit Gateway model focused on establishing connectivity by creating a full mesh of direct peering connections between all application VPCs

You need to ensure consistent threat prevention across all applications. Which approach should you use?

• A. Use Security Profiles Group
• B. Use NAT rules
• C. Disable inspection
• D. Apply profiles per application manually

An organization wants to modernize its legacy branch architecture. The existing architecture is rigid, complex, and ill-suited for a cloud-first strategy, creating high operational costs and latency.
- The four core data centers are strategically located in Dallas, Toronto, London and Tokyo, and they are interconnected by a dedicated MPLS backbone providing reliable connectivity but incurring significant costs and offering limited bandwidth scalability.
- Branches rely on MPLS or site-to-site VPN to connect to the nearest geographical data center.
- All internet-bound traffic from the branches is backhauled to the data center egress firewalls.
This creates latency for SaaS applications and increases bandwidth strain on the MPLS links.
The organization requires a proposal for a new WAN architecture for branch connectivity with the goal of improving security posture and SaaS application access as well as supporting local internet breakout for all branch devices, including IoT.
Which two implementations will achieve the goal of modernizing the branch architecture?
(Choose two.)

• A. NGFW at each branch with Large Scale VPN (LSVPN) for data center access and Direct Internet Access (DIA)
• B. SSE with Prisma Access for mobile users and service connections
• C. SASE with Prisma Access for remote networks and service connections
• D. SD-WAN using on-premises NGFWs for Direct Internet Access (DIA)

An organization has a directive to adopt a Zero Trust framework focused on using identity and role-based access groups, device security and content inspection across all Security policies. To achieve this goal, an Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) was purchased, including Advanced Threat Prevention, IoT Security, and GlobalProtect.
The current security architecture uses Panorama to manage 60 NGFWs - a mix of PA-3240, PA-1410, and PA-440. Sites with PA-3240s host private application resources in the trust data center zone All sites have an untrust zone for internet access and a users zone for managed and unmanaged endpoint devices. A transit mesh zone exists to establish site-to-site connectivity through PAN-OS SD-WAN.
Privately hosted applications include web servers, SMB and NFS file servers and hosted Active Directory. The organization is in the process of adopting group mapping restrictions to these private applications, with daily additions of groups. It is also planning to build AI applications to assist the data teams with complex queries that will be hosted in the large offices containing data centers and is exploring hosting in the public cloud.
The organization uses on-premises Exchange, Dropbox, Zoom, and ChatGPT. There are a number of shadow SaaS applications that require further investigation. Users have been using Google Drive to upload confidential files within the organization by using their personal logins.
IoT devices on the network are associated on their own VLAN on the users zone. Using Device Security, all IoT devices have been categorized by asset profiles with medium or high confidence, policy sets imported into Panorama, and a default deny applied to the IoT networks.
The organization has rolled out SSL decryption and is using URL categorization for the majority of content filtering. Malicious categories, unknown and high-risk websites are blocked, with the remainder of sites set to alert.
Which action should the architect recommend to restrict the confidential file exfiltration present in the organization's environment using existing technology?

• A. Using App-ID, create a policy denying google- drive-web-upload
• B. In Prisma Browser create an access security rule and a data security rule preventing file-upload unsanctioned file-sharing applications
• C. Using Enterprise DLP, create custom data patterns notifying confidential data, and block the custom data pattern from being uploaded
• D. Using SaaS Security, enable tenant restrictions, preventing personal logins from using unsanctioned applications